Tonight was the GBUC d’été (university and cegep people getting together for singing, fellowship, discussions, bible studies…) anyways, tonight we talked about the issue of poverty here in Québec, well more here in Montréal and a wee bit on poverty in the rest of the world.
We had some good discussions about poverty, what it means, the reasons for it and such. I relunctantly wrote “good” discussions because to me it was not so good. From a non-Christian point of view, we probably had good discussions. But from a Christian point of view, I really wonder how good our time was. I mean, everything we talked about was “good” but we didn’t talk about the real reason for poverty: it’s a spiritual problem, well that’s what I believe. Apart for a few comments in te beginning, we did not talk about what Christians are called to do about poverty in our neighborhoods, in the world. We didn’t talk about God’s first goal: to bring glory to Himself and free people from sin’s curse. The solutions that were given us were good and praiseworthy, but I’m afrid that too often, we work hard on providing for physical needs of the poor while what they truly need is peace with God. It is true that when someone’s dying of thirst, we should give him some water and not start telling the person about the Gospel. We all know that.
Anyways, I was sad that we as Christians did not talk about the greatest need of human beings, salvation in Jesus Christ. I know that our discussions were not on “spiritual” poverty but it seems to me that we can’t put the Gospel on one side and feeding the hungry on the other (as Christians) we’re all seeking the Kingdom of God, and this means obedience to God, this means helping the widow and the fatherless, this means telling people about Christ. I don’t know if you understand my point of view, but Christians’ motivation for helping people and being good should always be based on a desire to see God’s standards be applied and to spread the Good News. I just thought that our motivation in talking about poverty was simply to do something about it, learn how we can help, that’s humanistic motivations. It didn’t seem that we talked about poverty because we longed to see God glorified and people saved.
I think that there is a danger that our good intentions to help the poor become what it is: good intentions. A lot of missionary agencies in the past, were implanted in many countries, to help the poor, provide schools and hospitals. All these things were good, but the thing is that overtime, these missionaries’ first focus was not to bring the Gospel anymore, but simply to help the poor and provide education. I think it is more than important that our actions to help the poor be motivated with Jesus’ motivations and be salted with the Gospel. That it’d be in our hearts to see people coming to Christ.
Ah, and I have so much to say about thhe way we view poverty here and our responsibility to our brothers and sisters in the East! We should help the poor at home first, this is true, don’t take me wrong. But anyways, if you were at the GBUC meeting you probably think I got it all wrong. Please let me know how you think and how I can clarify to you what I believe.
Ok, if you were at the GBUC meeting, please know that I, by no means, think anything bad about you, I seriously don’t! But I just think that it’s sort of ironic that after talking about poverty, the usual “let’s go for coffee” was out. I felt like telling people that we should put aside the money we would have used for a coffee and help someone in need with it. But as usual, I didn’t say a word.
Apart from that, the little ice-breaker was a lot of fun. (…) And I hear a voice saying inside of Jess’ head “Ya right Gabe”.